[1]崔金环)△,田华),王琛),等.不同蠕形螨病原学检查方法效果比较及相关因素对检出率的影响[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2013,(02):272.
 CUI Jinhuan),TIAN Hua),WANG Chen),et al.Effects of pathogenic diagnosis of human demodex mites and related factors on detection rate[J].JOURNAL OF ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES),2013,(02):272.
点击复制

不同蠕形螨病原学检查方法效果比较及相关因素对检出率的影响
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(医学版)》[ISSN:1671-6825/CN:41-1340/R]

卷:
期数:
2013年02期
页码:
272
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2013-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of pathogenic diagnosis of human demodex mites and related factors on detection rate
作者:
崔金环1)田华2)王琛3)徐颖4)邢秀伟1)
1)商丘医学高等专科学校病原生物学及免疫学教研室 商丘 4761002)商丘医学高等专科学校生物化学教研室 商丘 476100 3)商丘医学高等专科学校药理学教研室 商丘 476100 4)商丘医学高等专科学校预防医学教研室 商丘 476100
Author(s):
CUI Jinhuan1) TIAN Hua2)WANG Chen3)XU Ying4) XING Xiuwei1)
1)Department of Pathogen Biology and Immunology,Shangqiu Medical College,Shangqiu 4761002)Department of Biochemistry,Shangqiu Medical College,Shangqiu 4761003)Department of Pharmacology,Shangqiu Medical College,Shangqiu 4761004)Department of Preventive Medicine,Shangqiu Medical College,Shangqiu 476100
关键词:
人体蠕形螨检查方法
Keywords:
human demodex miteexamination method
分类号:
R753.3
摘要:
探讨不同病原学检查法对人体蠕形螨的检出效果及相关因素对检出率的影响,寻找更佳的蠕形螨检查方法。方法:采用刮脂法、粘贴法及挤刮法在同一人群(共585人)的鼻部取材进行蠕形螨检查。 结果:刮脂法、粘贴法及挤刮法的蠕形螨检出率分别为43.2%(253/585)、29.1%(170/585)及31.8%(186/585)。3种方法中检出率最高的是刮脂法,与其他2组比较差异均有统计学意义(χ2=74.075、45.343,P均=0.001)。3种方法不同性别患者的检出率比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.965、2.546、0.008,P均>0.05)。不同季节粘贴法的检出率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.994,P=0.046)。结论:刮脂法的检螨效果优于粘贴法和挤刮法。3种不同检查方法对男女检出率无差异。粘贴法的检出率受季节变化影响,而刮脂法和挤刮法则不受季节变化影响。
Abstract:
Aim: To compare the detection rate of human demodex mites with different methods and analyze the related factors on the detection rate so as to find better method of examining demodicidosis. Methods: In the same population(n=585), three kinds of different examination methods(scraping method,transparent adhesive method, and squeezing method)were applied to detect the mite on the nose.Results: The detection rates of scraping method,transparent adhesive method, and squeezing method were separately 43.2%(253/585), 29.1%(170/585), and 31.8%(186/585). The detection rate of scraping method was significantly higher than those of the other two kinds of method(χ2=74.075, 45.343, P=0.001).The detection rate had no significant difference between different gender(χ2=0.965, 2.546, 0.008,P>0.05). The detection rate of transparent adhesive method had significant difference among different seasons(χ2=3.994,P=0.046).Conclusion: The detection rate of scraping method is higher than the other two kinds of method. Different examination methods will not affect the detection rate in different genders.The detection rate of transparent adhesive method will be affected by different seasons while scraping method and squeezing method will not.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘继鑫,李朝品,王克霞,等.不同人群人体蠕形螨感染情况调查[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2008,6(1):30
[2]赵献云,邢杰.两种检查蠕形螨方法效果比较[J].武警医学院学报,2006,15(4):341
[3]虎永兰.两种方法检查青海某高职学院学生人体蠕形螨感染情况调查[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2007,5(4):246
[4]黄松,杨雅平.人体蠕形螨病原学检查的研究进展[J].首都医科大学学报,2006,27(3):420
[5]侯玉英,孙焕梅,任竹英,等.人体蠕形螨病诊断方法的探讨[J].山西医学院学报,1996,27(2):146

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
△女,1963年5月生,本科,副教授,研究方向:病原生物与免疫学,Email:sqyzcjh2004@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-04-19