[1]王秀玲△,王文颖.家属应对策略量表的信度和效度评价[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2013,(04):550.
 WANG Xiuling,WANG Wenying.Evaluation of reliability and validity of coping strategy scale for family members[J].JOURNAL OF ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES),2013,(04):550.
点击复制

家属应对策略量表的信度和效度评价
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(医学版)》[ISSN:1671-6825/CN:41-1340/R]

卷:
期数:
2013年04期
页码:
550
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2013-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of reliability and validity of coping strategy scale for family members
作者:
王秀玲王文颖
郑州大学第一附属医院急诊科 郑州 450052
Author(s):
WANG XiulingWANG Wenying
Department of Emergency,the First Affiliated Hospital,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052
关键词:
家属应对信度效度
Keywords:
family member cope reliability validity
分类号:
G449.1;R195.1
摘要:
目的:评价家属应对策略量表在急诊患者家属中应用的信度和效度。方法:修订家属应对策略量表后,调查242名急诊患者家属,将收集的资料进行统计学分析。结果:家属应对策略量表Cronbachs α系数和分半信度分别为0.873、0.809;内容效度指数CVI为0.87;两个维度的Pearson相关系数为0.498,与总量表的相关系数分别为0.761、0.782;验证性因子分析证实了两因子模型拟合较好。结论:家属应对策略量表的信效度较好,具有临床应用价值。
Abstract:
Aim: To evaluate the applicability of coping strategy scale for family members in family members of the patients from Department of Emergency. Methods:A total of 242 family members of the patients from Department of Emergency were recruited to complete the revised coping strategy scale for family members. The collected data were analyzed by statistic software. Results: The Cronbachs α and splithalf coefficient for the coping strategy scale for family members were 0.873 and 0.809, respectively. The content validity index was 0.87; the correlation coefficient between the two dimensions and the whole scale was 0.498,0.761,and 0.782, respectively; the twofactor models fit well. Conclusion: The coping strategy scale for family members is a valid and reliable instrument to use in clinic.

参考文献/References:

[1]Chan CK,So WK,Fong DY.Hong Kong baccalaureate nursing students stress and their coping strategies in clinical practice [J].J Prof Nurs,2009,25(5):307
[2]ODriscoll MP.Coping with stress: a challenge for theory, research and practice [J].Stress Health,2013,29(2):89
[3]Hostutler JJ,Taft SH,Snyder C.Patient needs in the emergency department [J].J Nurs Adm,1999,29(1):43
[4]Frank C, Fridlund B, Baigi A, et al. Patient participation in the emergency department: an evaluation using a specific instrument to measure patient participation(PEED) [J]. J Adv Nurs,2011,67(4):728
[5]Kelly MM,Xie A,Caravon P, et al. Strategies for improving family engagement during familycentered rounds [J].J Hosp Med,2013,8(4):201
[6]王文颖.中文版疾病不确定感家属量表的修订及在CCU患者家属的应用
[D].天津:天津医科大学,2012.
[7]许郁卿,马凤岐,林丽君,等.急诊科病患家属压力感受及其因应策略之探讨 [J].护理暨健康照护研究,1998,5(3):201
[8]金华.PMDD证候严重程度测评表的初步编制及信效度检验
[D].山东:山东中医药大学,2012.
[9]李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究 [J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541
[10]Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Principle and methods
[M].7th ed. Lippineott: Williams & Wilkins,2003:423
[11]蒋艳,沈宁,邹树芳.护理研究中问卷研制及测量学特征的评定方法 [J].中华护理教育,2005,2(4):174
[12]郭庆科.心理测验的原理与应用
[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002:167
[13]Munro B.Statistical methods for health care research
[M].Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2004:318
[14]王文颖,王申,夏大胜,等.中文版疾病不确定感家属量表的信效度研究 [J].护理研究,2012,26(3A):662
[15]汤泉,张理义.军人心理承受力量表的信度效度检验 [J]. 解放军医学杂志,2010, 35(2):228

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
女,1968年4月生,本科,副主任医师,研究方向:重症护理,Email:wangxiuling661228@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-07-25