[1]李闯,罗圣明,卢欢欢,等.职业技术学院教师职业生命质量及其影响因素[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2015,(04):559-562.
 LI Chuang,LUO Shengming,LU Huanhuan,et al.Analysis on the influencing factors of quality of work life among vocational school teachers[J].JOURNAL OF ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES),2015,(04):559-562.
点击复制

职业技术学院教师职业生命质量及其影响因素()
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(医学版)》[ISSN:1671-6825/CN:41-1340/R]

卷:
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
559-562
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2015-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on the influencing factors of quality of work life among vocational school teachers
作者:
李闯罗圣明卢欢欢朱伟#
郑州大学公共卫生学院社会医学与卫生事业管理学教研室 郑州 450001
Author(s):
LI ChuangLUO ShengmingLU HuanhuanZHU Wei
Department of Social Medicine and Health Management,College of Public Health,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001
关键词:
职业技术学院教师职业生命质量影响因素
Keywords:
vocational schoolteacherquality of work lifeinfluencing factor
分类号:
R192.6
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:了解职业技术学院教师的职业生命质量(QWL)及影响因素。 方法:采用随机整群抽样的方法抽取河南省3所职业技术学院1 200名教师,采用职业生命质量量表(QWL732)进行问卷调查。结果:女性教师在心理健康维度和工作主动性维度的得分高于男性教师(t=2.603和3.613,P<0.05);不同年龄教师在生理健康、心理健康、职业胜任感、工作主动性和工作与家庭平衡感维度的得分差异有统计学意义(F=3.648、8.216、4.256、8.250和7.662,P<0.05);已婚教师在职业胜任感、职业满意度、职业自豪感和工作主动性维度的得分高于未婚者(t=4.485、2.101、2.009和3.260,P<0.05)。不同职称状况教师在生理健康、职业满意度、职业自豪感、工作主动性维度的得分差异有统计学意义(F=3.104、3.582、2.931、3.744,P<0.05)。多重线性回归分析结果显示,影响职业技术学院教师QWL的因素有工作适宜性(β=1.641,t=17.719,P<0.001)、工作协作(β=1.403,t=9.491,P<0.001)、上级支持(β=1.167,t=7.918,P<0.001)、管理措施(β=-0.786,t=5.931,P<0.001)和年龄(β=1.717,t=3.610,P<0.001)。结论:通过改善相关的职业影响因素可以提高职业技术学院教师的QWL。
Abstract:
Aim: To explore the quality of work life(QWL) situation, and its influencing factors among vocational school teachers.Methods: A total of 1 200 teachers from 3 vocational schools in Henan Province were selected by cluster sampling and were questionnaired using QWL732 scale. Results: The female teachers' scores were significantly higher than the male teachers' in mental health and initiation(t=2.603 and 3.613,P<0.05). The scores in physical health, mental health, sense of competence, initiation and sense of balance between work and family had significant differences among teachers at different ages(F=3.648,8.216,4.256,8.250 and 7.662,P<0.05). The scores in sense of competence, satisfaction, pride and initiation among teachers with different married status had significant differences(F=4.485,2.101,2.009 and 3.260,P<0.05). The scores in physical health,satisfaction,pride and initiation among the teachers with different titles of technical post had significant differences(F=3.104,3.582,2.931,3.744,P<0.05).The influencing factors of QWL screened by multiple linear regression were job propriety(β=1.641,t=17.719,P<0.001),job cooperation(β=1.043,t=9.491,P<0.001), support from leaders(β=1.167,t=7.918,P<0.001), administration(β=-0.786,t=5.931,P<0.001) and age(β=1.717,t=3.610,P<0.001).Conclusion: Improving the occupational factors would help to improve the QWL among vocational school teachers.

参考文献/References:

[1]丰成祥,朱伟,张菲菲,等.郑州市4所医院护士职业生命质量影响因素分析[J].郑州大学学报:医学版,2013,48(2):263
[2]孙钰华.工作生活质量:追求教师工作与生活的和谐发展[J].比较教育研究,2008(4):83
[3]罗儒国.教师工作生活质量研究:盘点与反思[J].西北师大学报:社会科学版,2012(1):107
[4]Narehan H,Hairunnisa M,Norfadzillah MA,et al.The effect of quality of work life (QWL) programs on quality of life (QOL) among employees at multinational companies in Malaysia[J].Procedia Soc Behav Sci,2014,112(15):24
[5]张琴,兰亚佳,陈红梅.职业紧张与职业生命质量的关系研究[J].四川大学学报:医学版,2011,42(4):540
[6]舒晓燕.高中教师工作生活质量探析[J].教学与管理,2009(19):18
[7]孙云志.高职院校教师工作生活质量探析[J].高等农业教育,2012(8):89
[8]蔡晓武,廖传景.高校青年教师职业倦怠与工作生活质量的相关研究[J].重庆高教研究,2013,1(2):54
[9]邓子鹃.工作家庭冲突、工作效能感与工作生活质量:基于苏北268名高校女教师的实证研究[J].教育学术月刊,2013(3):34

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01