[1]刘 梦),田庆丰)#,王仲阳),等.运用TOPSIS法和秩和比法综合评价2014年河南省医疗服务质量*[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2016,(05):617-622.
 LIU Meng),TIAN Qingfeng),WANG Zhongyang),et al.Comprehensive evaluation of the quality of health care service of Henan Province in 2014 using TOPSIS combined with rank-sum ratio method[J].JOURNAL OF ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES),2016,(05):617-622.
点击复制

运用TOPSIS法和秩和比法综合评价2014年河南省医疗服务质量*()
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(医学版)》[ISSN:1671-6825/CN:41-1340/R]

卷:
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
617-622
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2016-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comprehensive evaluation of the quality of health care service of Henan Province in 2014 using TOPSIS combined with rank-sum ratio method
作者:
刘 梦1)田庆丰1)#王仲阳2)李洪彦2)
1)郑州大学公共卫生学院社会医学与卫生事业管理学教研室 郑州 450001;2)河南省卫生计生委 郑州 450001
Author(s):
LIU Meng1)TIAN Qingfeng1)WANG Zhongyang2)LI Hongyan2)
1)Department of Social Medicine and Public Health Management,School of Public Health,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001;2)Henan Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission, Zhengzhou 450001
关键词:
TOPSIS法 秩和比法 医疗服务质量 河南省
Keywords:
TOPSIS method rank-sum ratio quality of health care services Henan Province
分类号:
R197
摘要:
目的:对河南省2014年各市医疗服务质量进行综合评价。方法:选取河南省2014年各市总诊疗人数、出院人数、病床使用率、出院者平均住院日、急诊死亡率、预约人次占总诊疗人次百分比、住院病人手术人次数、每百门急诊入院人数等8个指标,运用TOPSIS法、秩和比法及二者加权模糊联合法进行医疗服务质量评估。结果:TOPSIS法评价中郑州、周口及新乡市医疗服务质量排在前三名,C值都在0.3以上; 秩和比法评价中周口、郑州及南阳市排在前三位,RSR值均大于0.7; 二者加权模糊联合法评价中郑州、周口及新乡市医疗服务质量位于前三名。3种方法评价中鹤壁、济源均排名末二位。3种方法评价结果一致。结论:构建了河南省医疗服务质量综合评价模型。
Abstract:
Aim: To evaluate the quality of the health care services of Henan Province in 2014.Methods: Eight indexes(including total number of diagnosis and treatment, the number of hospital, hospital bed utilization rate, average hospital stays of the discharged, emergency mortality, the percentage of booking passengers to the total outpatient visits, inpatient surgery number, the number of outpatient and emergency per hundred)of the cities of Henan Province were collected and used to evaluate the quality of the health care services by TOPSIS,Rank-sum ratio(RSR)method, and the weighted fuzzy combination of TOPSIS and RSR.Results: Zhengzhou,Zhoukou and Xinxiang were the top three with C value above 0.3 in TOPSIS evaluation. Zhoukou, Zhengzhou and Nanyang were the top three with RSR value greater than 0.7 in RSR evaluation. Zhengzhou,Zhoukou and Xinxiang were the top three when evaluated by the weighted fuzzy combination of TOPSIS and RSR. Hebi and Jiyuan all ranked at the end two by the three methods. The results of the 3 methods were consistent.Conclusion: Henan provincial medical service quality comprehensive evaluation model has been established.

参考文献/References:

[1] 曾娜.海南省三甲医院医疗服务质量综合评价模型研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2014.
[2] 谢冬华,叶冬仙,赵利,等.几种常见评价方法在长沙市三级医院医疗服务质量评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2010,27(4):355
[3] 薛飞,时松和,田庆丰.基于TOPSIS法的焦作市妇幼保健服务质量5年动态研究[J].现代预防医学,2015,42(17):3139
[4] 陈雪侠,孙爱峰.秩和比法在医院医疗质量综合评价及其变化发展趋势中的应用[J].中国医药指南,2014,12(8):249
[5] 王荷,宋培歌,安琳.运用TOPSIS法和秩和比法综合评价我国孕产妇保健情况[J].中国卫生统计,2015,32(2):240
[6] 郭建新,樊锦春.应用秩和比法对各地区2009年医院门诊、住院医疗服务综合评价[J].现代医院,2015,15(1):97
[7] 樊宏,吉华萍,杜宪明,等.应用综合指数法及秩和比法综合评价某市2008年~2010年的医疗服务质量[J].卫生软科学,2012,26(3):201
[8] 周绿林,张婷婷,王森.医疗服务质量与患者满意度关系研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2014,31(1):14

相似文献/References:

[1]张晓星),杨萌萌),蒋淑敏),等.基于密切值法和秩和比法的农村卫生费用使用情况评价[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2018,(06):719.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2018.03.061]
 ZHANG Xiaoxing),YANG Mengmeng),JIANG Shumin),et al.Evaluation on health expenditure in rural area of China based on close-value method and RSR method[J].JOURNAL OF ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES),2018,(05):719.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2018.03.061]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*河南省卫生资源配置标准研究咨询服务合同 HN-ZYPZ-ZX-2011; 国家社会科学基金项目 15BSH043
#通信作者,男,1963年9月生,博士,教授,研究方向:卫生事业管理,E-mail:zzutqf@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-08-20