[1]刘少峥,孙建华.显微内窥镜治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症疗效分析[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2018,(03):395-398.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2017.11.027]
 LIU Shaozheng,SUN Jianhua.Analysis of clinical efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation[J].JOURNAL OF ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES),2018,(03):395-398.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2017.11.027]
点击复制

显微内窥镜治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症疗效分析()
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(医学版)》[ISSN:1671-6825/CN:41-1340/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
395-398
栏目:
应用研究
出版日期:
2018-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of clinical efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation
作者:
刘少峥孙建华
石河子大学医学院第一附属医院骨科 新疆石河子 832008
Author(s):
LIU Shaozheng SUN Jianhua
Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University, Shihezi,Xinjiang 832008
关键词:
显微内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术 脱出型腰椎间盘突出 疗效
Keywords:
microendoscopic discectomy prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion efficacy
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6825.2017.11.027
摘要:
目的:探讨显微内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(MED)治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:选择2015年9 月至2016年9月应用MED(观察组,70例)和传统椎板切除手术(对照组,60例)治疗的脱出型腰椎间盘突出症患者进行随访,统计并比较两组患者术前、术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月、9个月、12个月的日本骨科协会评估治疗分数(JOA,评估患者功能障碍)、视觉模拟评分(VAS,评估患者的疼痛强度)、MacNab 疗效评定标准(评估临床疗效的优良率)以及两种患者手术时间、术中出血、并发症和术后住院时间的差异。结果:所有患者术后JOA评分较术前明显升高,术后VAS评分较术前明显降低; MED的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间均优于传统椎板切除术(P<0.05)。结论:MED是治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症的有效方法。
Abstract:
Aim: To explore the clinical efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods: Seventy patients with prominent LDH undergoing MED(observation group)and 60 patients with the same symptom undergoing traditional laminectomy(control group)from September 2015 to September 2016 were selected for follow-up. For the two groups, the related results of JOA scores(for evaluating dysfunction), VAS scores(for evaluation pain intensity), MacNab effect(for evaluating acceptance rate of efficacy), operation time, bleeding amount, complication, and postoperation hospital stay at pre-operation, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after operation were compared.Results: For all the 130 patients, the JOA scores were higher than pre-operation; the postoperative VAS scores were lower than pre-operation; MED was better than traditional laminectomy in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stays(P<0.05).Conclusion: MED is effective for curing LDH.

参考文献/References:

[1] 凌华军, 范磊, 赖茂松, 等. 椎间盘镜与椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(3): 47
[2] PHAN K, XU J, SCHULTZ K, et al. Full-endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic and open discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2017, 154: 1
[3] 马信龙. 重视腰椎间盘突出症的病理分型,选择合适的治疗方法[J]. 天津医药, 2015, 43(11): 1235
[4] 丁文彬, 郑召民, 王建儒, 等. 微创与开放经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎病变的Meta分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2015, 25(1): 45
[5] 何百祥, 鲍刚. 重视脊柱稳定性的保护与重建,积极稳妥地开展脊柱神经外科手术[J]. 西安交通大学学报(医学版), 2016, 37(2): 157
[6] HE J, XIAO S, WU Z, et al. Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(5): 1373
[7] HOU T, ZHOU Q, DAI F, et al. Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation[J]. Clinics(Sao Paulo), 2015, 70(2): 120.
[8] WANG M, ZHOU Y, WANG J, et al. A 10-year follow-up study on long-term clinical outcomes of lumbar microendoscopic discectomy[J]. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2012, 73(4): 195
[9] KULKARNI AG, BASSI A, DHRUV A. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: Technique and results of 188 cases[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2014, 48(1): 81.
[10]陈旭,张如意,张琳,等.影像引导下经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗钙化型腰椎间盘突出症:41例报告[J]. 解放军医学杂志,2014,39(8):678

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【作者简介】孙建华,通信作者,男,1972年5月生,博士,主任医师,研究方向:椎间盘退变,E-mail:758719985@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-20